QRI · Investigation-first quality management

Turn fragmented quality evidence into a defensible investigation.

QRI works beside the quality system you already use. It connects the evidence behind NCR, CAPA, 8D, supplier, and failure investigations; exposes contradictions and unsupported claims; and assembles a cited package for human review.

Investigation Assurance is the front door. The broader modular quality-management platform is included on the same governed foundation.

See the $10K benchmark
  • Works beside your existing QMS
  • Evidence-bound, human-controlled claims
  • Customer-local deployment under qualified profiles
  • One platform entitlement across supported modules
QRI investigation-first quality management dashboard with synthetic demonstration data
Synthetic demonstration data. Exact product and deployment support remains tied to the accepted release and qualified operating profile.
The actual bottleneck

The forms are not the hard part. The evidence is.

Quality evidence is usually distributed across the QMS, controlled documents, test logs, photos, supplier records, ERP or MES exports, spreadsheets, email, and previous investigations. QRI assembles the permitted context without pretending that every source is complete or correct.

Root-cause language that is not supported by governed evidence

Conflicting values across logs, worksheets, source systems, or revisions

Missing evidence that prevents a defensible conclusion

Stale controlled-document references and incomplete source lineage

Relevant historical cases and prior actions whose effectiveness later failed

Claims that should remain inconclusive or require another test

How QRI works

From source case to a controlled result.

01

Connect or import the case

Start from the QMS, governed export, or controlled file path the quality team already uses. No day-one replacement is required.

02

Assemble the permitted evidence context

Bring together the exact report, evidence, controlled document, supplier, action, effectiveness, and historical-case facts the investigator is authorized to use.

03

Expose conflicts, gaps, and precedents

Separate what is known from what conflicts, what remains unsupported, and which prior cases are relevant or only superficially similar.

04

Compile a cited investigation

Produce a human-controlled brief or report draft whose material assertions link to governed evidence or remain visibly unsupported.

05

Review, approve, and return

Use the controlled reviewer workflow and return the approved package to the incumbent QMS or governed export path.

Product screens

A real operating workspace, not a chatbot bolted onto a form.

These screens use synthetic demonstration data. Additional investigation, evidence, RCA, preflight, and reviewer views are shared only from the truthful release candidate used for the benchmark or pilot.

QRI work queue for governed quality investigations imported from a connected QMS. Synthetic demonstration data.

Investigation work queue

See assigned, blocked, review-ready, and returned investigation work without treating the browser as quality authority.

QRI quality dashboard showing investigation status and connected-system health. Synthetic demonstration data.

Quality operations dashboard

Track current work, blockers, downstream consequences, and connected-system state through one governed product surface.

QRI My Work screen showing assigned quality investigation tasks. Synthetic demonstration data.

Role-aware My Work

Investigators, reviewers, and administrators see the work and actions appropriate to their current authority and scope.

Platform direction · Quality Context

Connect the investigation context without creating a second uncontrolled truth.

Quality Context is QRI’s closed, quality-specific model over exact versioned subjects and relationships. It supports the investigation outcome; it is not marketed as a generic ontology platform. Availability expands through separately accepted product slices.

Source caseQuality reportField factEvidence artifactRCA conclusionHistorical caseDocument revisionSupplier versionCorrective actionEffectiveness check

Governed connectors

Durable synchronization, mapping, source ownership, explicit unknown outcomes, writeback receipts, and reconciliation remain the integration plane.

REST, OpenAPI, events, and SDKs

Ordinary applications use versioned product contracts instead of direct database access or one-off browser automation.

Scoped MCP access

A separately isolated read/proposal edge is qualification-gated for demonstrated enterprise-agent workflows. It is not the authority or synchronization plane.

One authority foundation

PostgreSQL-backed QRI authority remains the controlled commit boundary. Connectors, providers, agents, and browser values remain untrusted inputs.

Human-controlled intelligence

Intelligence assists the investigation. It does not become quality authority.

The current governed foundation and the qualification-gated Navigator roadmap are shown separately. Exact model-assisted capabilities depend on the accepted release, task policy, local model package, hardware profile, and customer operating profile.

Current governed foundation
  • Governed evidence, provenance, and exact citations
  • Historical-case retrieval and recorded comparison
  • Evidence-safe RCA proposals with human disposition
  • Deterministic preflight, review, and controlled return
Qualification-gated direction
  • Proposed fact extraction with exact source coordinates
  • Contradiction, missing-evidence, and unsupported-claim detection
  • Recommended questions, evidence requests, or tests
  • Cited investigation drafting through a qualified local model route
The included platform

The investigation is the front door. The platform is the QMS.

Customers buy one QRI platform rather than a temporary investigation tool that must later be replaced. The exact support state remains visible while QRI progressively expands native authority across the corrective-quality loop and broader QMS workflows.

QRI native

Investigations and reports

Import, author, preflight, review, approve, return, reconcile, and preserve exact history.

QRI native

Evidence, provenance, and RCA

Governed evidence, exact citations, field provenance, historical comparisons, and human-disposed RCA proposals.

QRI native

Actions

Create, assign, complete with evidence, and independently review corrective work.

QRI native

Effectiveness

Schedule, execute, review, preserve ineffective history, and return work to rework when required.

Connected today · native expansion

Quality Events and CAPA

Preserve incumbent lineage today while the native corrective-quality loop expands on the same authority foundation.

Connected registers · native expansion

Documents and Suppliers

Use exact controlled revisions and supplier lineage now, with native workflows planned as governed product slices.

Two paid ways to start

Prove the investigation outcome before expanding scope.

Both entry points are paid, fixed-scope engagements. Neither requires a day-one global QMS replacement.

Founding benchmark

$10,000

Replay three to five completed investigations and measure evidence gathering, contradictions, unsupported claims, precedent retrieval, and the path to a cited review-ready brief.

  • Fixed scope and paid upfront
  • One QMS export plus one controlled document or file source
  • 10 business days after usable data is received
  • Executive benchmark readout and production-pilot recommendation
Full benchmark scope
Design partner pilot

$25,000

An eight-week, one-site engagement for a live or customer-controlled workflow under an explicitly agreed deployment, security, source-rights, validation, retention, and writeback boundary.

  • One site and one primary investigation or report family
  • Historical cases plus one current controlled workflow when qualified
  • Investigator and reviewer handoff with governed package or export
  • Measured production-expansion decision
Frequently asked questions

Straight answers before the first call.

What is QRI?+

QRI is an investigation-first quality management platform. It connects the evidence behind NCR, CAPA, 8D, supplier, and failure investigations, exposes conflicts and unsupported claims, and produces a cited package for human review.

Does QRI replace our current QMS?+

Not on day one. QRI can operate beside an existing QMS, preserve source ownership, and return an approved package. Customers can progressively operate supported workflows natively in QRI when they are ready.

What is Quality Context?+

Quality Context is QRI’s quality-specific operating model over exact source cases, reports, facts, evidence, document revisions, suppliers, actions, effectiveness checks, and their governed relationships. It is supporting product architecture, not a generic ontology product.

Will QRI support MCP and enterprise agents?+

QRI is designed for a separately isolated, permission-filtered MCP access edge for read and proposal workflows after the exact customer workflow and security profile are qualified. MCP does not replace connectors, query PostgreSQL directly, or expose model-controlled approval, closure, waiver, effectiveness acceptance, or external dispatch.

Can QRI run locally?+

QRI is designed for customer-local and disconnected deployment under exact qualified operating profiles. The supported operating system, database, ingress, identity, storage, model, backup, and writeback boundaries are stated for each deployment rather than implied broadly.

Does QRI certify compliance or guarantee the root cause?+

No. QRI does not certify a customer, and it does not claim that a model can determine the true root cause. It helps teams assemble evidence, preserve provenance, expose uncertainty, and complete their own controlled review and approval process.

Start with one difficult investigation

Judge QRI against the process you use today.

Bring a completed, de-identified investigation and the evidence your team actually used. We will tell you honestly whether QRI can create a useful, defensible benchmark within the fixed scope.

hello@tengrivertex.com