tengri.
Back to Blog
February 18, 2024
11 min read

LLM Integration & RAG Systems: Production-Ready AI Applications

Building production-ready LLM applications with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Practical patterns for integrating large language models into enterprise systems.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful, but integrating them into production systems requires more than just API calls. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) combines LLMs with your data to create accurate, context-aware applications. This guide covers production-ready patterns for LLM integration.

Understanding RAG

RAG solves the core limitation of LLMs: they don't have access to your specific data. RAG works by:

  1. Retrieval: Search your data sources for relevant context
  2. Augmentation: Combine retrieved context with the user query
  3. Generation: LLM generates response using the augmented context

This approach gives LLMs access to up-to-date, domain-specific information without fine-tuning, which is expensive and time-consuming.

1. Vector Databases and Embeddings

The foundation of RAG is semantic search using vector embeddings:

Vector Database Options:

  • Pinecone: Managed vector database, easy to use
  • Weaviate: Open-source, self-hostable
  • Qdrant: High-performance, Rust-based
  • Chroma: Lightweight, embedded option
  • pgvector: PostgreSQL extension for vector search

Embed your documents using models like OpenAI's text-embedding-ada-002, Cohere embeddings, or open-source alternatives (sentence-transformers).

2. Document Processing Pipeline

Before embedding, process your documents:

  • Chunking: Split documents into manageable pieces (500-1000 tokens)
  • Metadata extraction: Extract titles, dates, authors, categories
  • Text cleaning: Remove noise, normalize formatting
  • Structured data: Handle tables, code blocks, markdown

Use libraries like LangChain's text splitters or LlamaIndex for document processing.

3. Retrieval Strategies

Not all retrieval is equal. Use these patterns:

Retrieval Patterns:

  • Semantic search: Vector similarity search for meaning-based retrieval
  • Hybrid search: Combine vector search with keyword search (BM25)
  • Re-ranking: Use a cross-encoder to re-rank top results for accuracy
  • Metadata filtering: Filter by date, category, or other metadata before search
  • Multi-query: Generate multiple query variations and combine results

4. Prompt Engineering for RAG

Effective prompts are critical. Use these patterns:

  • Context injection: Clearly separate context from query
  • Instructions: Tell the LLM how to use the context
  • Output format: Specify desired response format
  • Fallback handling: What to do when context is insufficient

Example RAG Prompt Template:

Context:
{retrieved_documents}

Question: {user_query}

Answer the question using only the context provided. 
If the context doesn't contain enough information, 
say "I don't have enough information to answer this question."

5. Production Considerations

Production RAG systems need more than just retrieval and generation:

  • Rate limiting: Control API costs and prevent abuse
  • Caching: Cache embeddings and common queries
  • Monitoring: Track latency, token usage, costs
  • Error handling: Graceful degradation when LLM APIs fail
  • Cost optimization: Use smaller models when possible, cache responses

6. LangChain and LlamaIndex

Frameworks simplify RAG implementation:

LangChain

  • • Comprehensive framework
  • • Many integrations
  • • Flexible, modular
  • • Good for complex workflows

LlamaIndex

  • • RAG-optimized
  • • Built-in query engines
  • • Easy to get started
  • • Good documentation

7. Evaluation and Testing

RAG systems are hard to evaluate. Use these metrics:

  • Retrieval accuracy: Are relevant documents retrieved?
  • Answer quality: Is the generated answer correct and relevant?
  • Latency: Response time for end users
  • Cost per query: Token usage and API costs

Use evaluation frameworks like LangSmith or build custom evaluation pipelines with human feedback loops.

8. Common Patterns

Pattern 1: Question Answering

Retrieve relevant documents, inject into prompt, generate answer. Best for knowledge bases and documentation.

Pattern 2: Conversational RAG

Maintain conversation history, retrieve context for each turn, generate contextual responses. Use for chatbots.

Pattern 3: Multi-Step Reasoning

Break complex queries into steps, retrieve context for each step, chain reasoning. Use for complex analytical queries.

9. Security and Privacy

LLM integration introduces security considerations:

  • Data privacy: Don't send sensitive data to external LLM APIs
  • Prompt injection: Validate and sanitize user inputs
  • On-device models: Use local models for sensitive use cases
  • Access control: Restrict RAG access based on user permissions
  • Audit logging: Log all queries and responses for compliance

Conclusion

RAG is the most practical way to integrate LLMs into production systems. Start with semantic search, implement proper document processing, and iterate on retrieval strategies. The key is balancing accuracy, latency, and cost.

At Tengri Vertex, we build production-ready LLM applications with RAG. From document processing pipelines to vector databases and prompt engineering, we help organizations deploy AI that actually works.